<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ModStomp - Games &#38; Gadgets &#38; Stuff! &#187; Aviation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.modstomp.com/category/aviation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.modstomp.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:59:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>RC Airplanes are fun too</title>
		<link>http://www.modstomp.com/rc-airplanes-are-fun-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.modstomp.com/rc-airplanes-are-fun-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rudeboy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geek Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.modstomp.com/?p=335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an effort to get the word out, I thought I&#8217;d stick a post out here about my new RC Plane site. I&#8217;ve played with RC toys for most of my life, but I thought I&#8217;d try selling a few and helping others to find a fun hobby. We&#8217;ve got all sorts of cool stuff [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an effort to get the word out, I thought I&#8217;d stick a post out here about my new <a href="http://www.rcplanepro.com">RC Plane</a> site.  I&#8217;ve played with RC toys for most of my life, but I thought I&#8217;d try selling a few and helping others to find a fun hobby.  We&#8217;ve got all sorts of cool stuff over there for all skill levels.  We&#8217;ve got trainers, jets, helicopters, warbirds and stunt planes.  Whether you&#8217;re a veteran RC pilot or if you&#8217;re interested in trying it out for the first time, head on over to <a href="http://www.rcplanepro.com">RC Plane Pro</a> and check out our selection of planes and helis.  </p>
<p><center><a href="http://www.rcplanepro.com"><img src="http://www.modstomp.com/images/rcplanepro.jpg"></a></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.modstomp.com/rc-airplanes-are-fun-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What else can you do with a B-58?</title>
		<link>http://www.modstomp.com/what-else-can-you-do-with-a-b-58/</link>
		<comments>http://www.modstomp.com/what-else-can-you-do-with-a-b-58/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zarch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geek Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.modstomp.com/what-else-can-you-do-with-a-b-58/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about a spy plane? Convair always had unusual ideas, and it seemed like among them was a fascination with drones.&#160; The CIA and the Air Force were worried about the U2 even before it entered service.&#160; Despite its performance characteristics, Russians could track the ugly thing on radar with no difficulty.&#160; So remember that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a spy plane? Convair always had unusual ideas, and it seemed like among them was a fascination with drones.&#160; The CIA and the Air Force were worried about the U2 even before it entered service.&#160; Despite its performance characteristics, Russians could track the ugly thing on radar with no difficulty.&#160; So remember that pod hanging from the bottom of the B-58?&#160; Well, what if that carried a drone instead of a nuclear weapon?</p>
<p>Convair had experimented with parasite aircraft prior to advances in aerial refueling.&#160; With the extended range and high cruising speed of the B-36 Peacemaker, fighters of the day had difficulty keeping up.&#160; Jet fighters didn’t have the range, and prop fighters didn’t have the speed.&#160; The solution was the X-85 Goblin, designed to hang from a hook in one of the B-36’s bomb bays.&#160; It wasn’t a great solution; I’ll do a future post about it.</p>
<p>In this case, though, Convair proposed an two-piece parasite; one manned, the second unmanned.&#160; The host aircraft would accelerate to Mach 2 so the ramjet on the parasite had enough airflow to fire up; once released, it could hit Mach 4, which made it invulnerable to fighters and surface-to-air missiles of the time.&#160; It would land like the X-15; on a belly skid.&#160; </p>
<p>There were immense problems with this idea.&#160; First, the parasite was probably to heavy and produced too much drag to allow the host B-58 enough speed for the ramjets to fire up.&#160; Second, the B-58B program was cancelled while development continued.&#160; </p>
<p>The Fish (as it was called) was ahead of its time: it used ceramic materials to help with supersonic heat and absorb radar; it was shaped to limit radar cross-section; it featured a lifting body design to extend its range to nearly 4000 miles.&#160; All this in the 1950s.&#160; </p>
<p>Links to much more detail and excellent pictures over at <a href="http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/planes/q0287.shtml">aerospcaeweb.org</a>.</p>
<p><em>Additional editorial commentary: it amazes me how little progress has been made in aerospace since the middle of the last century.&#160; In the recent controversy over the Obama administrations proposed cancellation of the Constellation project, some key thoughts have been overlooked.&#160; First, the great advances in aviation were often made by small teams of engineers at private companies like Lockheed and Convair (and even Boeing).&#160; NASA today has become a huge bureaucratic mess; it takes 25,000 employees several months just to refurbish the Space Shuttle for one launch.&#160; NASA’s plan to return to the moon and go on to Mars was described as “Apollo on Steroids”; but Apollo, while a magnificent feat, was done with unlimited budgets and the only motivation to beat the Russians.&#160; After the moon, interest died and NASA turned into a jobs program.&#160; People want more aerospace research; funding NASA is unlikely to provide progress, any more than funding the Post Office (contemplating 5-day delivery, still at a loss) is more likely to produce better mail delivery or funding Amtrak more (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acela_Express">Acela</a> – too many compromises and priced too high, especially compared to Asian and European systems) is likely to produce innovative rail service.&#160; For innovation in aerospace, look to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaled_Composites">Scaled Composites</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacex">SpaceX</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_Galactic">Virgin Galactic</a>, and innumerable other small companies.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.modstomp.com/what-else-can-you-do-with-a-b-58/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Awesome Planes &#8211; B-58 Hustler</title>
		<link>http://www.modstomp.com/awesome-planes-b-58-hustler/</link>
		<comments>http://www.modstomp.com/awesome-planes-b-58-hustler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 03:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zarch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.modstomp.com/awesome-planes-b-58-hustler/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought it might be fun to do a series on interesting aircraft from around the world.&#160; I’ve got a particular fascination for Cold War planes; the mission requirements made for very interesting designs and capabilities.&#160; The B-58 Hustler is a great place to start. In the late 1940s, the boys at Wright-Patterson were already [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it might be fun to do a series on interesting aircraft from around the world.&#160; I’ve got a particular fascination for Cold War planes; the mission requirements made for very interesting designs and capabilities.&#160; The B-58 Hustler is a great place to start.</p>
<p>In the late 1940s, the boys at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wright-Patterson">Wright-Patterson</a> were already trying to capitalize on the supersonic breakthrough of 1947, when Chuck Yeager popped the sound barrier in the Glamorous Glennis (more formally known as a Bell X-1, aircraft #46-062).&#160; Those beautiful minds at Convair (cf. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-36">B-36 Peacemaker</a>) came up with a sharp-nosed, wasp-wasted, delta wing design:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.modstomp.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/image.png"><img style="display: inline" title="image" alt="image" src="http://www.modstomp.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/image_thumb.png" width="502" height="332" /></a> </p>
<p>The wasp shape was deliberate; such a shape <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_rule">smoothes out shock waves generated by supersonic flight</a>.</p>
<p>Under the wings were four J79 engines from General Electric, good for 15,600 lbs of thrust each (a version of the J79 also powered the F-104 Starfighter, the Corvette of fighter planes and subject of a future post).&#160; These were good for a speed of about Mach 2, if the plane could operate at altitude as designed.</p>
<p>Other unique features include the large pod, designed to carry nuclear weapons (either a B43 or a B61); a strange escape capsule (image credit to Wikipedia user J_Clear) designed to protect each crew member during a super-sonic ejection; and an early and sophisticated inertial navigation system.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.modstomp.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/image1.png"><img style="display: inline" title="image" alt="image" src="http://www.modstomp.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/image_thumb1.png" width="502" height="378" /></a> </p>
<p>Improvements in Russian surface-to-air missile technology drove the Hustler into a low-altitude penetration role.&#160; The range of the plane was already problematic, and flying at low altitude made things worse. The B-58 was not an easy plane to fly; nearly a quarter of all production aircraft were lost to accidents.&#160; These drawbacks got the Air Force thinking about the B-1 Lancer program (and were pretty much ignored with the ultra-crazy B-70 Valkyrie).</p>
<p>The B-58 is high up on my list of personal favorites.&#160; It’s a beautiful aircraft with extraordinary capabilities.&#160; If you’re ever in Dayton, go over to WPAFB and check it out.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.modstomp.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/20100330AirForceMuseum146.jpg"><img style="display: inline" title="2010-03-30 Air Force Museum 146" alt="2010-03-30 Air Force Museum 146" src="http://www.modstomp.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/20100330AirForceMuseum146_thumb.jpg" width="502" height="378" /></a> </p>
<p>Note – I’m an amateur enthusiast, and so I’m always open to feedback and corrections to any information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.modstomp.com/awesome-planes-b-58-hustler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

